Is the Star Trek economy a welfare state?
Yes and no. Like everything else about the Star Trek franchise, it’s complicated. And if we are being honest about the nature of the question, it is likely the term “welfare state” is meant as a pejorative meant to elicit disgust.
Quora is rife with people who want to attack any idea which doesn’t promote capitalism as the “perfect bastion” of economic development. Like anything else with this franchise, judging Star Trek’s social format by today’s standards is less than ideal and certainly not going to make sense because the psychology of the people living in the Federation and Humans alive today are impossibly different in perspective.
In the Federation, as a “post-scarcity” society whose primary need is energy, there isn’t a reason to force people into work the way our modern society does, because people are required to pay for everything they need today. In that society, as long as energy exists, most people can live at a level modern Humans simply are unable to imagine, hence the fact it is “science fiction.”
However the underlying principle of post-scarcity could be done and the term welfare state doesn’t have to be a pejorative (as it is surely being presented here – with the idea that “welfare” – the social program used to support people in our modern society – is bad). Our society is capable of providing for everyone if we were willing to reorder our capitalistic urges toward more humanitarian goals. There is sufficient food and economic resources if we didn’t allow money to pool into the economic gravity wells called millionaires and billionaires on Earth, held away from normal citizens by the predatory compensation drives dictated by capitalism.
By the average meaning of the term “welfare state” the government of the Federation IS concerned with the welfare of its citizens providing them with a quality of life superior to anything on our current Earth.
“The welfare state is a form of government in which the state (or a well-established network of social institutions) protects and promotes the economic and social well-being of its citizens, based upon the principles of equal opportunity, equitable distribution of wealth, and public responsibility for citizens unable to avail themselves of the minimal provisions for a good life. Sociologist T. H. Marshall described the modern welfare state as a distinctive combination of democracy, welfare, and capitalism.” — (Welfare state – Wikipedia)
In the Federation, citizens want for nothing, can choose to or not choose to work, they will still have all that they need. Their education is assured, their healthcare maintained and their livelihood is a creation of their CHOICES, not the circumstances of governments and corporations more concerned with the creation of WEALTH than the betterment of the entire species.
Your choices are determined by your INTERESTS, your APTITUDES, and your DESIRES. People in the Federation are fully-realized and able to choose the kind of work which truly helps them be the best kind of person they can be, without the mindless avarice which drives our current society.
Can you create new technologies? Sure you can, but you are probably going to be doing it in conjunction with other teams, who will share the glory and the development with the Federation as a whole? Can you get wealthier because of your creativity? Probably not nearly as much, but in a world where intellectual, creative, socially-aware and humanitarian efforts are rewarded with renown, your opportunities to do more, with reasonable hours, with fantastically talented people working on the biggest ideas of the Federation are all but assured.
Nothing breeds success like success. If this is the “welfare state” where no one wants for anything, is able to work toward whatever their aptitudes lead them, to be able to get the training you need to learn anything that interests you without having you grinding your life away in mindless work for unappreciative bastards who will turn your efforts into cash for them…
Living in the Federation includes a more realized social justice system, quality public housing and healthcare, educational and skilled training, as well as the capacity for every individual to reach the peak of their physical, mental and emotional development, up to and including joining Starfleet, living off-world and exploring the galaxy in a number of capacities as scientists, engineers and other technical specialists or artists.
GIVE ME ONE OF THOSE WELFARE STATES, where my welfare matters to the government and their goal is to enhance the opportunities for EVERYONE in their community.
-30-
Thaddeus Howze is an award-winning essayist, editor, and futurist exploring the crossroads of activism, sustainability, and human resilience. He's a columnist and assistant editor for SCIFI.radio and as the Answer-Man, he keeps his eye on the future of speculative fiction, pop-culture and modern technology. Thaddeus Howze is the author of two speculative works — ‘Hayward's Reach’ and ‘Broken Glass.’
So you’re one of those crazy nuts who wants everyone to be healthy and happy? Next thing you’ll be wanting to get rid of poverty, war, and….
Seriously, I agree wholeheartedly with this for the Federation–and would like to see it on modern day Earth. Of course the Ferengi macroculture would be at odds with this.
My suspicion is that the “welfare state” you describe is in some ways closer to early human societies than to modern day. It’s also close to what the early Christians practiced according to the Bible.
“All the believers were together and had everything in common. They sold property and possessions to give to anyone who had need. Every day they continued to meet together in the temple courts. They broke bread in their homes and ate together with glad and sincere hearts, praising God and enjoying the favor of all the people. And the Lord added to their number daily those who were being saved.” Acts 2:44-47.
To paraphrase Tito from “Oliver & Company”, if this is welfare state, chain me to the walls!”
Sadly, this is NOT the welfare state. In an alternative article (which I had… and am trying to relocate), an economist stated that while improved technology certainly can make life more comfortable and efficient… in the end, Roddenberry’s vision rests upon one fundamental assumption: that Man is Good.
Without that, new technology only serves to give those who control it more power, and many subtle forms of power, by which to control their fellow man. (And/or aliens.) The greedy Ferengi possess all of the technology of the Federation. The militaristic Cardassians, likewise.
Roddenberry wanted… desperately… to “believe in the goodness of humanity”. But there is a great deal of evidence to the contrary.
Star Trek’s Utopia is a lot like Disneyland. Lots of pretty facade but all of the ugly nitty gritty details of keeping it running are hidden away from view. Who keeps the Holodecks clean? Sweeps the streets? Takes out the trash? Sanitizes the public communicators et al?